About Me

Name: Josiah623
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

  • Typical
    Equal Time for...
    Rubberduck Crusader

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

GOPocalypto Plus One

In a trailer for his new movie Apocalypto, acclaimed actor/director Mel Gibson explains, “Apocalypto means to have a new beginning.  Unfortunately to have a new beginning, something else has to end.”  The film details the cataclysmic destruction of the corrupt, decadent Mayan civilization in Central America 600 years ago.

 

Ironically Apocalypto opened on December 8th, 2006, almost exactly a month after the GOP had an apocalypto of it’s own in the 2006 elections, a GOPocalypto if you will.  Twelve years after the historic 1994 elections brought them to power, the GOP lost control of both the U.S. House and Senate to the Democrats in only a slightly less dramatic fashion.

 

In millions of disgruntled traditionalists and conservatives there exists the hope that 2006 will mark a new beginning for the GOP.  But before we answer the question, “Where do we go from here?”  prudence dictates that Republicans analyze the reasons for our loss so that we may go forward in a more informed manner.

 

In the first days after the GOP’s November defeat, I heard a lot of four letter words bantered about.  All of them were “Iraq”.  I don’t think anyone can deny that the war did in fact play a key role in GOP’s misfortune.  Attacking Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, a proven state sponsor of terror, with the idea of building a freer, more democratic (whatever that means) Middle East may have been a noble idea; an idea that most national Democratic leaders agreed with at the beginning I might add.  But in reality it has proven to be a much longer, harder, even self defeating road than most of us really expected.  And the policy is most associated in the national mind with GOP President Bush.

 

But a bad turn of events in an otherwise honorable endeavor was not the only aspect of the war that turned voters off.  The Bush administration’s seeming inflexibility and misunderstanding of the war contributed to the electoral defeat also.  We all remember the president flying to the aircraft carrier to proclaim, “Mission Accomplished”, or Dick Cheney’s characterization of the insurgents as “a few dead-enders.”  Sectarian violence waxed and waned, but mostly waxed as the months progressed.  But most of what we heard from the White House was “stay the course.”  Even when the President’s team clarified they really meant stay the course, but adjust to the situation on the ground as required, little of the stated policy was backed up with meaningful action.  Whatever one’s thoughts are on the justification for Operation Iraqi freedom, there’s little doubt the mishandling of it added steam to Republican electoral woes. 

 

Scandals certainly played their part bringing about November’s shift in partisan power. That the Republican Party is responsible for these faux paws however is much more misperception than an accurate gauge of what’s right and wrong in America today.  Sure there were a lot of Republicans that were touched by Abramoff money.  But many Democrats worked with Abramoff and associates too; his corruption crossed party lines.  On a separate item, Tom DeLay, former Republican speaker of the House was indicted for violating campaign finance laws.  But from what I’ve read of the charges, DeLay’s actions never once crossed the line of any particular statute.  His only crime was to live under the jurisdiction of a highly partisan Democrat-appointed judge.  Certainly there was nothing remotely more onerous with DeLay than was commonplace in the financial dealings of the Clinton White House.

 

Oh, and then there’s the Congressman Mark Foley scandal.  Granted, the GOP leadership’s and their staff’s response to Foley’s abhorrent behavior reflected a little too much forgiveness and a little too little tough love.  But in the final analysis, when exposed, Mark Foley resigned.  Republicans called their leaders to account for not dealing with him in stronger manner.  They did NOT hold a press conference defending a homosexual relationship between a man and a boy, live in a home from out of which a gay prostitution ring was being run, or get in America’s face and say their colleague’s behavior “was nobody’s business but ours”, all sins for which leading Democratic officials have been guilty in the last 20 years. 

 

Facts and hypocrisy notwithstanding, Republicans were in power; and as such they bore the brunt of the American public’s wrath over a scandal-ridden Washington culture of corruption.

 

So we have Iraq.  We have scandals.  Maybe even add bureaucratic mishandling of the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.  But that’s not the big story.  The number one reason for Republican losses this November large scale Republican betrayal of its core principals and its base.

 

Soon after the election, former GOP presidential candidate Gary Bauer wrote a post mortem that appeared in Investors Business Daily and is printed on http://www.ouramericanvalues.org/.   He argued that although values voters put the GOP in power in 2002 and 2004, little emphasis was placed on values issues the past two years.  Indeed he is correct.  There was some work on a federal constitutional amendment to protect traditional marriage and legislation to stop the death of Terri Schiavo.  But there was other legislation that was largely ignored.  A federal bill to define personhood as beginning at conception went nowhere, even in the GOP.  Efforts to limit court jurisdiction over 10 Commandments emblems on public property or to protect home schooling were heard of only in conservative publications, not the halls of Congress.  Gary Bauer was right on the mark.

 

And then there’s the 1000 pound gorilla that’s about to break through the basement cellar ceiling where it’s kept.  Spending.  Republican platforms have long called for limiting the size of government, but overall government outlays continually exceed the heights of the Clinton administration’s excess these days.  And need I remind we HAD a Republican President, House, and Senate by a reasonable margin.  Earmarks, previously identified as pork projects are out of control.  This year, according to http://www.cnsnews.com/ citing Citizens against Government Waste, there were over 10,000 earmarks costing a total of $29 billion. Republicans were cited over Democrats as the “Party of Big Government” by a margin of 39.3% to 27.9 according to a November poll by the Club for Growth, http://www.clubforgrowth.org/.  Indeed, fiscal irresponsibility reigned supreme under the Republican Congress and President.

 

So Republicans lost power this year because of Iraq, scandals, and perhaps even Katrina.  But nothing trumps the betrayal of core values and base voters as causing November’s defeat.  Fortunately there’s only a 51 to 49 Democratic margin in the Senate and it’s woefully large in the House either.  The way I look at it, this November was a warning shot; let’s hope Republican leaders got the message.  We wouldn’t want the party to go the way of the Mayans in Apocalypto.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What is 8th Commandment Conservatism?

Greetings.  My name is Josiah623, or that’s my pseudonym at least.  Thankyou for reading this inaugural posting to 8th Commandment Conservative.

Like most blogs, this journal will consist primarily of my random musings on whatever topic (primarily political) seems most relevant at any given time.  But one might ask why did I choose to entitle it 8thCommandmentConservative?  What does that mean?

The term 8th Commandment Conservative serves to illustrate two concepts that I believe are at the very core of what is means to be a conservative:  Property Rights and Values.
 

The right of a person to own and control their own property is probably the single most important ideal upon which our Republican form of government is based.  The American Founding Fathers viewed property not only in the narrow sense as a person’s land or homestead.  Property in the 18th Century understanding encompassed a person’s land, body, other possessions, their words or speech, ideas, and beliefs.  The Founding Fathers fashioned a government in which a citizen’s right to their property was sacrosanct and the state’s powers were very limited.  They understood that if people were made responsible for themselves and what they own, only then would America secure a more productive and meaningful existence.  An America in which all of us take care of all of us would be doomed end in poverty and despotism.
 

A second key point of 8th Commandment Conservatism is the idea that personal morality is an indispensable component of any civil society.  The Founding Fathers are well known (maybe not in academia or the media, but from other sources) for their comments about how only a moral and virtuous people are suited for self government.  I was struck some time ago while reading City of God by St. Augustine how big of a concern public morality was to political philosophers of all times.  Simply put, the police can’t be everywhere all the time.  Governments must rely on people choosing to do well because of conscience (i.e. being moral) most of the time in order to maintain civil order.
 

The name 8th Commandment Conservative is also comes from the belief that our law is based on the laws enumerated in the Bible.  God the Father, through His Son, Jesus Christ, through the power of the Holy Spirit as revealed in Bible (not God “broadly defined”) is the author of Law.  Satan may be the prince of the powers of the air, but Jesus Christ is King.  The laws of our land are only valid insofar as they conform to God’s perfect Law as revealed in the Old and New Testaments.  A great man, Alan Keyes, once made a speech for which the punch line was “You cannot have the right to do what is wrong.”  8th Commandment Conservative is dedicated to upholding this wise statement.
 

The 8th Commandment of Exodus 20 is “Thou shalt not steal.”  It presupposes that that people have the right to own private property.  If no one held a private claim to anything, it would not be possible to steal from anyone else.  Therefore, by the 8th Commandment, we clearly know God intended for private property to be respected.
 

So the name, 8th Commandment Conservative, describes what the conservative philosophy is about (protecting private property).  And it is a testimony to where our philosophy comes from (God and the Bible).
 

If you’re interested in the fight for limited government, respect for private property rights, and the upholding of Biblical values in the public arena, check back frequently.  This blog’s for you!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »